Reparación de lesiones en nervios mediante el implante de prótesis obtenidas de segmentos acelulares de nervio isogénico / Repair of nerve injury by implanting prostheses obtained from isogenic acellular nerve segments

Introducción. Cuando se produce una sección nerviosa con separación significativa de los cabos es necesario utilizar una prótesis, a modo de puente, para suturarlos. La mejor prótesis es un segmento de nervio autógeno, pero presenta importantes inconvenientes. Nuestro objetivo es comparar la eficacia de la sutura simple con la tubulización para el implante de una prótesis de nervio isogénico descelularizado. Material y método. Se utilizan 4 grupos de ratas Wistar. Grupo 0: animales donantes de nervio ciático. Grupo 1: recibió el implante con sutura término-terminal. Grupo 2: recibió el implante dentro de un tubo de ??-caprolactona. Grupo 3: lo recibió en un tubo de poliláctico-co-glicólico. Se evaluó la función motora (índice ciático) y la extensión de la regeneración (estudio histológico) a las 3 semanas del implante. Resultados. La regeneración ha sido irregular en los 3 grupos experimentales. En todos hay implantes en los que las fibras nerviosas regeneran la longitud máxima estudiada (15mm) y otros en los que la regeneración es muy escasa. La longitud media de regeneración es mayor en el grupo de sutura directa (G1), aunque la velocidad es similar en los 3. El grupo 1 muestra el mayor porcentaje de regeneración, aunque la variabilidad de los resultados impide que esta diferencia alcance significación estadística. No hemos hallado diferencias significativas entre los dos grupos con tubos de diferentes polímeros. Conclusión. Para implantar prótesis de nervios isogénicos descelularizados es más eficaz, en nuestras condiciones experimentales, la sutura término-terminal que los tubos de polímeros biocompatibles (AU)

Introduction. When a nerve section with a significant gap occurs, it is necessary to use a prosthesis to suture it. To date an autologous nerve segment graft appears to be the best treatment; but it has several important disadvantages. Our goal is to study the effectiveness of an isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis comparing a simple suture with tubulisation. Material and method. Four groups of Wistar rats were used. The animals in Group 0 served as donors of nerve segments to graft. Group 1 received the implant with an end-to-end suture. In group 2, the implant was sutured inside an ??-caprolactone tube. Group 3 received it in a polylactic-co-glycolic acid tube. We evaluated the motor function (sciatic index and step test in motion), and the regeneration length by histological study of regeneration, after a maximum of 3 weeks. Results. Regeneration was uneven in the three groups. In all groups, there were implants with regenerated nerve fibres at the maximum studied length (15mm) and others where regeneration was scarce. The mean regeneration length was greater in the direct end-to-end suture group (G1), although the regeneration speed was similar in the three groups. Group 1 showed the highest percentage of regeneration, but the variability of results prevents this difference reaching statistical significance. We found no significant differences between the two groups with polymer tubes. Conclusion. For the implantation of isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis, under our experimental conditions, the direct end-to-end suture was more effective than when it isprotected with biopolymer tubes (AU)

Repair of nerve injury by implanting prostheses obtained from isogenic acellular nerve segments. / Reparación de lesiones en nervios mediante el implante de prótesis obtenidas de segmentos acelulares de nervio isogénico.

INTRODUCTION: When a nerve section with a significant gap occurs, it is necessary to use a prosthesis to suture it. To date an autologous nerve segment graft appears to be the best treatment; but it has several important disadvantages. Our goal is to study the effectiveness of an isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis comparing a simple suture with tubulisation. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Four groups of Wistar rats were used. The animals in Group 0 served as donors of nerve segments to graft. Group 1 received the implant with an end-to-end suture. In group 2, the implant was sutured inside an ɛ-caprolactone tube. Group 3 received it in a polylactic-co-glycolic acid tube. We evaluated the motor function (sciatic index and step test in motion), and the regeneration length by histological study of regeneration, after a maximum of 3 weeks. RESULTS: Regeneration was uneven in the three groups. In all groups, there were implants with regenerated nerve fibres at the maximum studied length (15mm) and others where regeneration was scarce. The mean regeneration length was greater in the direct end-to-end suture group (G1), although the regeneration speed was similar in the three groups. Group 1 showed the highest percentage of regeneration, but the variability of results prevents this difference reaching statistical significance. We found no significant differences between the two groups with polymer tubes. CONCLUSION: For the implantation of isogenic acellular nerve prosthesis, under our experimental conditions, the direct end-to-end suture was more effective than when it isprotected with biopolymer tubes.